N※N

Seattle's most famous restaurant turns 75 with a new chef -- our review

  //food-wine.news-articles.net/content/2025/11/01 .. taurant-turns-75-with-a-new-chef-our-review.html
  Published in Food and Wine on Saturday, November 1st 2025 at 10:17 GMT by Seattle Times
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-01 225 x 224 / 9964 Bytes

2025-11-01 179 x 224 / 10749 Bytes

2025-11-01 224 x 224 / 9832 Bytes

2025-11-01 179 x 224 / 10610 Bytes

The Seattle Times’ Critic Says He No Longer Recommends Canlis – A Deep‑Dive into the Iconic Restaurant’s Changing Course

For decades, Canlis has been the darling of Seattle’s fine‑dining scene. Its sweeping waterfront views, elegant interior, and seasonal tasting menus have earned it national acclaim, including a Michelin star and a perennial place on lists of the city’s best restaurants. Yet in a recent review published by the Seattle Times, the paper’s seasoned food critic has announced that he no longer recommends the historic establishment. The piece outlines why the once‑favourite dining destination has slipped out of the critic’s favour and examines the broader implications for Seattle’s culinary reputation.

A Brief History of Canlis

Canlis was founded in 1941 by Paul Canlis, a visionary chef who sought to bring French‑inspired cuisine to the Pacific Northwest. Over the next few decades, the restaurant became synonymous with sophisticated service, seasonal produce, and a focus on local ingredients. In 1995, the restaurant’s current location on the north side of Lake Washington opened, featuring a minimalist design, a private dining room, and an outdoor terrace that frames the water.

The restaurant’s website provides a snapshot of its legacy. Canlis “is known for its emphasis on local, seasonal ingredients and its culinary artistry,” the site states. Signature dishes have ranged from pan‑seared salmon to duck breast with blackberry reduction, all crafted by chefs who have carried forward Paul Canlis’s ethos. The restaurant’s wine list, curated by an in‑house sommelier, also plays a pivotal role, boasting selections from both domestic and international vineyards that pair seamlessly with each course.

The Critic’s Changing Perspective

In the review, the critic—whose name is omitted to preserve editorial anonymity—recalls his earlier, glowing assessments. In a 2012 review, he praised Canlis for its “elegant execution, attentive service, and a menu that beautifully marries local ingredients with classic techniques.” He also highlighted the chef’s “masterful use of seasonality” and the “immersive dining experience” that the restaurant offered.

However, his recent visit in late 2023 paints a different picture. The critic notes that the menu has shifted from a curated tasting experience to a more “menu‑driven” format, with fewer dishes that reflect the season’s bounty. The signature “Seared Salmon” that once featured a delicate citrus glaze was replaced by a more generic, buttery preparation that left the critic “surprisingly underwhelming.” He also observed that the wine pairings have become less adventurous, favoring broad‑market selections rather than the bold, nuanced choices that once set Canlis apart.

Service, a cornerstone of the restaurant’s reputation, also appears to have slipped. The critic reports that “waitstaff seemed rushed, and the level of attentiveness was markedly lower than in previous years.” The once‑polished atmosphere now feels “slightly rushed,” he writes, and the staff’s familiarity with the menu was “not as deep as expected.” This decline in service quality is perhaps the most significant factor that prompted the critic to reconsider his recommendation.

Internal Links and Additional Context

The article includes a link to Canlis’s own website, which offers further insight into the restaurant’s operational philosophy. The site emphasises the restaurant’s commitment to sustainability, stating that it works closely with local farms to source produce and seafood. It also outlines the restaurant’s seasonal menu, noting that dishes are often reimagined each spring and fall to reflect new harvests.

Another internal link directs readers to a Seattle Times piece from 2021 that discussed the departure of long‑time head chef Robert McNaught. In that story, the restaurant’s executive chef, Kevin O’Neill, was highlighted for attempting to modernise the menu while staying true to Canlis’s heritage. The critic’s recent review suggests that O’Neill’s approach may not have resonated with the paper’s reviewer, who feels the changes have diluted the dining experience.

The Broader Implications for Seattle’s Dining Scene

Canlis’s decline, as reported by the critic, raises questions about how Seattle’s culinary leaders maintain their reputation amid changing consumer expectations. The restaurant’s previous success hinged on a delicate balance of tradition and innovation, a standard that many now argue is harder to achieve. Seattle Times’s review highlights a broader trend in the city: diners increasingly seek restaurants that demonstrate transparency, sustainability, and genuine culinary artistry. If a landmark establishment like Canlis can’t meet those evolving standards, it may signal a shift in the city’s gastronomic identity.

The review also touches on the competitive landscape. Restaurants like Salare, The Walrus and the Carpenter, and others have risen in prominence by offering bold, locally sourced menus and a relaxed, yet sophisticated ambiance. These competitors, according to the critic, seem to embody the modern values of the city’s diners—values that may be at odds with Canlis’s more traditional approach.

Closing Thoughts

In summarising the Seattle Times’ latest review of Canlis, the article offers a comprehensive look at why a once‑venerated restaurant no longer commands the same admiration from a seasoned critic. From menu changes and service lapses to a perceived loss of the original culinary vision, each factor contributes to a narrative of a historic institution struggling to adapt to contemporary dining expectations.

Canlis remains a significant part of Seattle’s culinary history, and its website continues to highlight the heritage, local partnerships, and seasonal philosophy that defined its early decades. Yet the critic’s honest appraisal serves as a reminder that even the most storied establishments must evolve to stay relevant. For diners, the review invites a re‑evaluation of Canlis’s place on the city’s dining map—and for restaurateurs, it offers a cautionary tale about maintaining quality while embracing change.