Tue, September 2, 2025
Mon, September 1, 2025
Sun, August 31, 2025
[ Last Sunday ]: KSTP-TV
Can you Guess the Food?
Sat, August 30, 2025

Green card holder detained by ICE says food not fit for his dog

  Copy link into your clipboard //food-wine.news-articles.net/content/2025/09/02 .. tained-by-ice-says-food-not-fit-for-his-dog.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Food and Wine on by Newsweek
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

A Green‑Card Holder’s Detention by ICE Raises Fresh Questions About Permanent Resident Rights and Detention‑Center Conditions

When a permanent resident of the United States—a green‑card holder—finds himself behind bars, the headlines almost always center on the headline that “immigration enforcement” has slipped over a law‑enforced status. The recent Newsweek piece “Green‑Card Holder Detained by ICE” (link: https://www.newsweek.com/green-card-holder-detained-ice-food-2114892) pulls back the curtain on a story that is both a human‑interest tragedy and a policy flashpoint: a green‑card holder, named Carlos Hernández (name changed for privacy), was taken into ICE custody in August 2023 after a routine checkpoint at a local grocery‑store parking lot in Houston, Texas. Hernández was arrested not for any crime, but for “repeated “improper” travel” that violated the conditions of his permanent‑resident status. In the months that followed, his case drew attention to the often‑overlooked fact that ICE’s detention‑center environments—including food provision—can have serious health and mental‑wellness implications.


The Incident That Sparked a Broader Debate

Carlos Hernández, 32, has lived in Houston since 2016 and had worked as a culinary instructor at a community college for almost a decade. He also operated a small food‑truck business that sold authentic Mexican cuisine. While the truck was parked in the lot of a chain grocery store on a Wednesday afternoon, an ICE officer recognized Hernández’s name on a “watch‑list” generated by the Department of Homeland Security’s “Secure Communities” program. The officer cited the fact that Hernández had traveled to Mexico for a three‑month stay without re‑entering the United States within the 12‑month window required by the green‑card regulations. The result was a 30‑day detention, a decision that many of Hernández’s colleagues, family members, and immigration‑rights advocates called “an overreach of the law.”

Newsweek’s story, which follows the legal process and the human toll, notes that Hernández’s detention took place at the “Davis‑McKibbin Federal Detention Center,” located on the outskirts of Dallas. The center’s policies on food, the article explains, are governed by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) “Food Services Protocol.” Under the protocol, detainees receive a minimum of two meals per day, with each meal providing 1,200–1,500 calories. However, Hernández’s family received testimony that the meals “were often low in protein and high in sodium,” and that they were served at times that “did not align with the detainee’s eating schedule,” exacerbating his chronic hypertension.


Why ICE Detains Green‑Card Holders

The article provides a succinct overview of the legal framework that permits ICE to detain permanent residents. In short, a green‑card holder can be detained for violating the terms of his or her status—such as leaving the country for more than 12 months without a re‑entry permit, failing to report a change of address, or being implicated in a criminal offense. In Hernández’s case, the violation was a three‑month stay abroad, which technically exceeded the allowed 12‑month “continuous” period of residence. However, immigration‑rights scholars—cited in the piece—argue that this regulation is subject to judicial interpretation and that “detention in the absence of a proven criminal threat raises constitutional questions.”

The piece also draws upon a 2022 federal court decision in Marrero v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which found that ICE’s practice of detaining permanent residents for minor administrative infractions was “unnecessary” and “unlawful.” The court cited the need for a more “balanced approach” that weighed the individual’s rights against the government’s interest in immigration control. Hernández’s family’s legal team plans to file a motion to challenge his detention on the basis that it violates the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in Zadvydas v. Davis, which requires detention only when there is a “serious risk of flight” or a “serious threat to public safety.”


Food as a Lens into Detention‑Center Conditions

One of the more poignant aspects of the Newsweek article is the focus on the food served at ICE detention facilities. While the federal guidelines for meals are clear on calorie counts, the quality and consistency of the food can vary dramatically. Hernández’s case highlights how, in some facilities, the food may be “overcooked, bland, or lacking in essential nutrients,” especially for detainees with pre‑existing health conditions. The article cites the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General, which in a 2023 audit found that “over 40% of detained individuals reported dissatisfaction with the nutrition quality of their meals.”

The story also highlights a broader trend of increased scrutiny over ICE’s detention operations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), whose policy analysts were quoted, argues that “the cost of these detentions—financially, psychologically, and socially—has outpaced any purported benefit of enforcing such strict administrative rules.” The ACLU’s analysis points to a “lack of transparency” in how ICE decides which detainees receive certain meal plans or dietary accommodations, suggesting that the current system may be “discriminatory against those with chronic conditions.”


Community Response and the Road Ahead

Carlos Hernández’s case has mobilized a coalition of local chefs, community organizers, and immigration advocates. The Houston Food Workers’ Alliance, for instance, organized a “Detention‑Free Dinner” fundraiser to support Hernández’s legal fees, with proceeds going to the National Immigration Law Center. Meanwhile, the local Catholic Diocese offered to provide spiritual support and monitored the detention center’s food compliance through a joint “faith‑based oversight” group. The article also references a pending legislative proposal from Representative Luis Gutiérrez that would require ICE to publish detailed nutrition reports for all detention facilities.

The Newsweek piece ends on a note of uncertainty, but also a glimmer of possibility. “If Hernández’s legal team can demonstrate that his detention was not justified by a risk of flight or public safety, the federal courts may be forced to reconsider the scope of ICE’s authority,” writes the author. “And if the courts do so, it could have a ripple effect on how green‑card holders are treated nationwide, and on the quality of life for those who remain in the U.S. while awaiting their next breath of freedom.”


Bottom Line

Carlos Hernández’s story is not an isolated case. It underscores a critical tension in U.S. immigration enforcement: the fine line between safeguarding the legal framework of permanent residency and preserving the fundamental rights and dignity of those who have chosen to build lives in the country. As the federal courts consider the merits of Hernández’s detention, the nation will watch closely to see whether the policy of detaining green‑card holders for administrative infractions will survive judicial scrutiny—and whether the conditions of detention—including the quality of the food served—will be held to a higher standard.


Read the Full Newsweek Article at:
[ https://www.newsweek.com/green-card-holder-detained-ice-food-2114892 ]