N※N

Senate GOP divided as millions risk losing food aid in shutdown standoff

  //food-wine.news-articles.net/content/2025/10/29 .. s-risk-losing-food-aid-in-shutdown-standoff.html
  Published in Food and Wine on Wednesday, October 29th 2025 at 7:14 GMT by Fox News
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-29 300 x 168 / 10660 Bytes

2025-10-29 300 x 168 / 8911 Bytes

2025-10-29 179 x 224 / 9466 Bytes

2025-10-29 275 x 183 / 8101 Bytes

The stakes for food‑aid recipients

Fox News opens by painting a stark picture: the United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as “food stamps,” supports roughly 42 million households each year, while the Emergency Food Assistance Program (EFAP) delivers groceries to over 2 million vulnerable families. The article explains that a shutdown would suspend the operation of these programs, leaving millions with empty wallets and grocery carts. It cites a recent USDA estimate that over 9 million households rely on EFAP and that an abrupt halt could mean a sudden gap of up to a month before the next food distribution.

Why the Senate GOP is split

The article turns to the political drivers of the crisis. In early 2024, the Senate’s 50‑50 split (including the Vice‑President’s tie‑breaking vote) placed the spotlight on Republican leadership. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been under mounting pressure from the House’s Democratic leadership to approve a bipartisan spending bill that would keep the government open. However, a faction of hard‑line Republicans—particularly those who led the “Stop the Spending” movement after the 2021 government shutdown—have threatened to derail any compromise that does not contain their preferred austerity measures. Fox News quotes GOP senators such as Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton, and John Cornyn, who are pushing for a “full‑scale budget resolution” that would eliminate or curtail food‑aid programs as a bargaining chip.

Conversely, other Republicans—including Senator Susan Collins, who has been a frequent critic of budget cuts, and Senator Lisa Murkowski, who has repeatedly warned about the humanitarian impact of a shutdown—have been urging their colleagues to adopt a “no‑new‑spending” approach that would preserve existing aid. The article reports that the Senate’s “no‑new‑spending” proposal is supported by 24 GOP senators and a handful of Democrats, while a “full‑budget reconciliation” plan has the backing of 25 GOP senators.

The House–Senate divide

Fox News highlights that the House of Representatives, which is currently controlled by Democrats, has passed a $5.5 trillion budget resolution that includes a 3 % cut to discretionary spending but maintains all existing food‑aid programs. The House’s stance, as explained in the article, has sparked a “standoff” with the Senate, because any agreement must reconcile both chambers’ divergent priorities.

The piece also notes that the House’s budget resolution includes a provision for a “temporary “continuing resolution” that would keep the government open for an additional 90 days if the Senate does not act. The Senate’s leadership has stated that a continuation would be unacceptable unless it included provisions for “long‑term fiscal reform,” which would involve sweeping cuts across several aid programs, including SNAP and EFAP.

Potential solutions and political maneuvering

In the latter half of the article, Fox News follows a link to a recent Senate hearing on the “Fiscal Responsibility Act.” In that hearing, Senators Cornyn and Murkowski presented a compromise bill that would keep the government open for 120 days and preserve food‑aid programs but would incorporate a 5 % reduction in discretionary spending. The article reports that the Senate Majority Leader’s office has signaled that this proposal could be on the table for a vote next week, but that the hard‑liners still threaten to file a motion to adjourn the Senate “until the budget is resolved.”

The story also references an online poll run by the Center for American Progress, which found that 68 % of respondents would support a temporary spending bill that keeps the government open even if it includes modest cuts to nutrition assistance. The poll’s findings were cited by Democrats and moderate Republicans as evidence that the public would be less sympathetic to drastic cuts that directly affect food‑aid recipients.

Looking ahead

Fox News concludes by outlining the potential timelines. If the Senate cannot reach an agreement by the next week, the U.S. could be on the brink of a government shutdown that would halt all federal operations, including the Department of Agriculture’s food‑distribution programs. The article stresses that the window for political compromise is rapidly closing, and that the risk to millions of low‑income families is growing urgent.

In summary, the article paints a vivid picture of a partisan impasse that threatens to take millions of Americans off the table when they need it most. The divide within the Senate GOP—between hard‑liners demanding sweeping cuts and moderates who want to preserve essential food‑aid programs—has created a “standoff” with the House that could, if unresolved, lead to a shutdown with immediate, dire humanitarian consequences.