N※N

Democrats under fire as food stamp funds run dry: 42 million Americans caught in shutdown fight

  //food-wine.news-articles.net/content/2025/10/23 .. -million-americans-caught-in-shutdown-fight.html
  Published in Food and Wine on Thursday, October 23rd 2025 at 15:20 GMT by Fox News
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

301x168/13472 Bytes

300x168/8805 Bytes

300x168/13940 Bytes

179x224/16557 Bytes

179x224/17370 Bytes

The Budget Freeze and the “Dry” SNAP Program

At the heart of the conflict is a stalemate over the federal appropriations bill that would keep the government running through the summer. House Republicans, led by Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, have insisted that a broader continuing resolution (CR) be passed that includes funding for all federal agencies. Democrats, in turn, argue that the CR should incorporate a short‑term “SNAP‑only” provision to prevent a sudden halt to the most vulnerable programs. Their view is that the existing budget framework does not earmark the necessary funds for SNAP, which relies on explicit appropriations to maintain the flow of benefits.

The Fox News article highlights that, under current law, the SNAP program can be shut off if Congress fails to provide an annual appropriation. In the event of a shutdown, the Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) would have to suspend the issuance of new E‑B‑Cards, effectively halting benefit disbursement to millions of households. While the USDA’s SNAP website (snapp.org) explains the program’s reliance on annual appropriations, the article underscores the stark difference between “funding a program” and “funding the program’s administration” – a nuance that has sparked debate over whether the Senate’s budget plan truly safeguards SNAP.

Democratic Leaders Respond to the Criticism

The Fox News piece quotes House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries as saying, “We’ve worked hard to find a bipartisan solution that keeps the program running, but it’s clear that the Republicans are unwilling to make the necessary compromise.” Jeffries points to the Senate’s “SNAP‑only” amendment that would add $5 billion to the budget, arguing that the measure would allow the program to operate uninterrupted. The amendment has faced opposition from Republicans who claim it would lead to fiscal irresponsibility and an “illicit” use of funds.

In a separate interview, Representative Rosa DeLauro, chair of the House Committee on Appropriations’ Agriculture Subcommittee, said that the party is “committed to protecting the lives of our most vulnerable” and that the delay is “causing unnecessary suffering.” DeLauro’s statement is echoed in a brief statement released by the House Democrats’ budget team, which asserts that the party is “working diligently to ensure that no family in America will be left without food assistance due to a political stalemate.”

Congressional Accountability and the Role of the USDA

The article cites statements from the USDA’s Deputy Secretary for Food and Nutrition, Mark McGovern, who warned that “the SNAP program is one of the most effective federal programs in reducing hunger and should be protected from political uncertainty.” McGovern’s remarks come in the context of a briefing that noted the program’s record of delivering $13.5 billion in assistance to low‑income households over the last fiscal year—a figure that has helped to reduce food insecurity rates from 12.4 % to 9.9 % since the program’s inception.

On the congressional side, a bipartisan letter from a group of House Representatives, including both Democrats and Republicans, was highlighted. The letter states that “the federal government has a responsibility to provide a reliable food supply to all Americans, and that a shutdown would undermine this duty.” The letter’s authors argue that any continued deadlock could set a dangerous precedent for future budgetary crises.

The Human Cost: Stories from the Front Lines

One of the most compelling elements of the Fox News article is its inclusion of stories from families on the brink of losing SNAP benefits. A mother of three from New Mexico, who prefers to remain anonymous, says, “If I lose my benefits, my kids might have to skip meals. I’ve been waiting for the approval of the new budget for weeks.” Similarly, a food‑bank worker in Ohio reports that “our volunteers are already seeing a decline in donations as people cut back on their groceries, and a shutdown would double that challenge.”

The article links to a recent report by Feeding America, which outlines that if SNAP funding is not secured, the agency could reduce benefits by 18 % and eliminate 20 % of the total benefit allocation. The report, published on the Feeding America website, is cited as evidence of the potential magnitude of the crisis.

What’s Next?

The Fox News piece ends by noting that the House and Senate are scheduled to hold a joint budget session by mid‑month, a session that could either avert the shutdown or confirm it. Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers are preparing a separate “stop‑gap” funding measure that would temporarily extend SNAP benefits while the broader appropriation is negotiated. Whether this measure will satisfy Republican opposition remains to be seen.

In the meantime, the 42 million Americans currently receiving SNAP benefits are on standby, waiting for the political wrangle to be resolved. The article underscores the urgency: “The next few weeks could be the difference between millions of families having a full plate and millions of families facing a hollow one.”