N※N

Food and Wine
Source : (remove) : KSTP
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Food and Wine
Source : (remove) : KSTP
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Watch live: Trump signs executive order on sports council, fitness test

Trump Signs Executive Orders Aimed at Providing COVID-19 Economic Relief Amid Congressional Stalemate

In a dramatic move from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, President Donald Trump on Saturday signed a series of executive actions designed to deliver economic relief to millions of Americans struggling amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. The signing ceremony, broadcast live, came after weeks of stalled negotiations between the White House and congressional Democrats over a comprehensive stimulus package. Trump framed these measures as a necessary bypass of what he described as partisan gridlock in Washington, emphasizing his commitment to helping everyday Americans during a time of unprecedented economic hardship.

The executive actions include four key components, each targeting different aspects of the economic fallout from COVID-19. First and foremost, Trump directed the deferral of payroll taxes for Americans earning less than $100,000 annually. This deferral, set to run from August 1 through December 31, 2020, aims to put more money directly into workers' pockets by temporarily suspending the 6.2% Social Security tax typically deducted from paychecks. However, critics have pointed out that this is not a tax cut but a deferral, meaning employees could face a repayment obligation in 2021 unless Congress acts to forgive it. Trump has vowed to push for permanent forgiveness if reelected, but the measure's long-term viability remains uncertain.

A second major pillar of the executive package extends enhanced unemployment benefits, albeit at a reduced level. Following the expiration of the $600 weekly federal supplement provided under the CARES Act at the end of July, Trump's order authorizes $400 per week in additional aid for unemployed workers. Of this amount, $300 would come from federal funds repurposed from disaster relief allocations, while states are expected to contribute the remaining $100. This hybrid funding model has raised eyebrows, with some governors expressing concerns about the financial burden on already strained state budgets. Trump administration officials have suggested that states could opt out or use existing federal grants to cover their share, but the logistics could complicate swift implementation.

In addition to unemployment and tax relief, the president addressed the looming eviction crisis by ordering federal agencies to explore ways to prevent evictions for renters unable to pay due to pandemic-related hardships. This directive stops short of a nationwide eviction moratorium but instructs the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to consider whether such a ban is necessary for public health reasons. Similarly, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) are tasked with providing assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure. While these steps signal an intent to protect vulnerable populations, legal experts question the executive branch's authority to enforce broad housing protections without congressional approval.

The fourth element focuses on student loan relief, extending the pause on federal student loan payments and interest accrual through the end of 2020. This builds on previous extensions under the CARES Act and is expected to benefit millions of borrowers by alleviating financial pressure during the economic downturn.

During the live signing event, Trump was flanked by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and other advisors, using the occasion to lambast Democrats for what he called their unwillingness to compromise. "The Democrats have been unreasonable," Trump stated, accusing them of holding up relief to include unrelated demands like funding for the Postal Service and election security. He positioned his actions as a bold alternative, declaring, "If Democrats continue to hold this critical relief hostage, I will act under my authority as president to get Americans the relief they need." The president also hinted at potential future executive orders if negotiations remain deadlocked.

The backdrop to these executive moves is a deeply divided Congress. Talks between White House officials, including Mnuchin and Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and Democratic leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer broke down on Friday after failing to bridge a trillion-dollar gap in proposed stimulus spending. Democrats have pushed for a $3 trillion package that includes robust state and local aid, expanded food assistance, and protections for essential workers, while Republicans countered with a roughly $1 trillion plan focused on liability protections for businesses and schools. With unemployment hovering around 10% and over 160,000 COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., the urgency for action is palpable, yet partisan divides have deepened as the November election approaches.

Reactions to Trump's executive orders were swift and polarized. Supporters, including many Republican lawmakers, praised the president for taking decisive action in the face of congressional inaction. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell commended the moves as "targeted relief" that avoids excessive spending. On social media, Trump allies amplified the narrative that these orders demonstrate strong leadership during a crisis.

Conversely, Democrats and legal experts decried the actions as unconstitutional overreaches that circumvent Congress's power of the purse. Pelosi called them "unworkable" and "paltry," arguing that they fail to address the scale of the crisis and could face legal challenges. Schumer echoed this, labeling the orders "unconstitutional slop" that provides inadequate support. Several lawsuits are already being prepared by advocacy groups, who argue that redirecting funds without congressional appropriation violates the separation of powers.

Economists have offered mixed assessments. While the payroll tax deferral and unemployment extension could provide short-term boosts to consumer spending, experts like Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics warn that the measures are insufficient compared to a full legislative package. The $400 unemployment benefit, for instance, represents a 33% cut from the previous $600 level, potentially leading to reduced economic activity as jobless Americans tighten their belts. Moreover, the reliance on state contributions for unemployment aid could result in uneven implementation across the country, exacerbating inequalities between wealthier and poorer states.

The housing directives, while well-intentioned, lack the teeth of a direct moratorium, leaving many renters and homeowners in limbo. Advocacy organizations like the National Low Income Housing Coalition have urged for more comprehensive protections, noting that an estimated 30-40 million Americans are at risk of eviction without stronger federal intervention.

From a broader perspective, these executive actions underscore the limitations of presidential power in fiscal matters. The Constitution grants Congress authority over spending, and past executive orders on similar issues have faced court scrutiny. For example, Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program has been embroiled in legal battles, and Trump's own travel ban underwent multiple revisions. Legal scholars predict that these new orders could meet a similar fate, potentially delaying or nullifying their impact.

Trump's decision to sign the orders at his private golf club added a layer of symbolism and controversy. Critics accused him of using the venue for political theater, especially as he hosted a fundraiser earlier in the day. The president, however, defended the location, noting it allowed for social distancing amid the pandemic.

Looking ahead, the executive actions may serve as a temporary bridge, but they are no substitute for bipartisan legislation. White House officials have indicated a willingness to resume talks, with Mnuchin stating that negotiations could restart if Democrats show flexibility. Pelosi and Schumer, meanwhile, have called on Republicans to return to the table with a more generous offer.

For everyday Americans, the immediate effects could be felt in the coming weeks. Unemployed workers might see the $400 boost in their benefits, though delays are possible due to administrative hurdles. Payroll processors will need to adjust systems for the tax deferral, and borrowers can breathe easier on student loans. Yet, the uncertainty surrounding legal challenges and funding sources looms large.

In the context of the 2020 presidential race, these moves position Trump as a proactive leader fighting for the "forgotten" American, a theme central to his campaign. Opponent Joe Biden has criticized the orders as inadequate, promising a more robust response if elected. As the nation grapples with a dual health and economic crisis, the path forward remains fraught with political maneuvering and policy debates.

Ultimately, while Trump's executive orders provide some measure of relief, they highlight the dysfunction in Washington and the urgent need for comprehensive, legislated solutions to steer the country through the pandemic's aftermath. As the live event concluded, the president signed the documents with a flourish, signaling his determination to act unilaterally if necessary—a stance that could define the remaining months of his term. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full The Hill Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/watch-live-trump-signs-executive-190000988.html ]