N※N

Food and Wine
Source : (remove) : Bridge Magazine
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Food and Wine
Source : (remove) : Bridge Magazine
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Former St. John's Coach Reveals How Adopting FIBA's Rules Could Improve College Basketball

How Adopting FIBA Rules Could Revolutionize College Basketball: Insights from a Former St. John's Coach

In the ever-evolving landscape of college basketball, where tradition often clashes with innovation, a compelling argument has emerged from a seasoned voice in the sport. A former head coach of St. John's University, with years of experience navigating the highs and lows of NCAA competition, has come forward with a bold proposal: it's time for college basketball to embrace FIBA rules. This isn't just a superficial tweak; it's a fundamental shift that could address longstanding issues plaguing the game, from sluggish pacing to mismatched player development. By aligning more closely with international standards, the coach argues, college hoops could become faster, fairer, and more engaging for fans, players, and coaches alike. Drawing from his own tenure at St. John's, where he witnessed the frustrations of outdated regulations firsthand, he outlines a vision that could propel the sport into a new era.

At the heart of this proposal is a deep dive into the key differences between NCAA and FIBA rules, and why the latter might hold the key to improvement. One of the most glaring disparities is the game structure itself. College basketball operates on a two-half format, with each half lasting 20 minutes, leading to a total game time that can feel drawn out, especially with frequent stoppages. In contrast, FIBA games are divided into four 10-minute quarters, a setup that promotes sustained intensity and allows for more strategic adjustments throughout the match. The former St. John's coach emphasizes how this quarterly system could inject much-needed rhythm into college games. "Imagine coaches having the ability to reset and adapt every 10 minutes," he explains. "It keeps teams on their toes and prevents those long lulls where momentum dies." This change alone could reduce the prevalence of blowouts and make comebacks more feasible, turning every game into a potential thriller.

Beyond structure, the shot clock stands out as a critical area for reform. The NCAA's 30-second shot clock often results in deliberate, possession-heavy offenses that prioritize ball control over creativity. FIBA's 24-second clock, however, forces quicker decisions, encouraging up-tempo play and rewarding athleticism. The coach recalls games at St. John's where his teams were bogged down by opponents milking the clock, leading to low-scoring affairs that alienated casual viewers. "Adopting the 24-second clock would force players to think and act faster, mirroring the demands of professional and international basketball," he notes. This adjustment could particularly benefit high-major programs with talented rosters, allowing stars to showcase their skills in a more dynamic environment. Moreover, it would better prepare American players for global competitions like the Olympics or FIBA World Cup, where the shorter clock is standard. The former coach points to recent international tournaments where U.S. teams struggled with pace, suggesting that early exposure in college could bridge that gap.

Another pivotal rule difference lies in goaltending and basket interference. Under NCAA rules, once the ball hits the rim, it's fair game for defenders to swat it away, even if it's on a downward trajectory. FIBA, however, prohibits interference once the ball is above the rim and descending, creating a cleaner, more offensive-friendly game. The ex-St. John's leader argues this rule change would lead to higher scoring and more highlight-reel dunks, as players wouldn't fear having their shots blocked at the last second. "It rewards aggression and skill without turning every possession into a wrestling match under the basket," he says. This could be a game-changer for college basketball's entertainment value, especially in an era where fans crave high-flying action akin to the NBA. He draws from his coaching days, remembering talented big men who were stifled by overly permissive defensive rules, and envisions a future where post play becomes more fluid and exciting.

Timeouts and game management also come under scrutiny in this proposal. College basketball allows for a plethora of timeouts—up to four per half, plus media timeouts—which can disrupt flow and extend games unnecessarily. FIBA limits timeouts to two per half, with additional ones in overtime, fostering a more continuous style of play. The former coach highlights how excessive timeouts in the NCAA often lead to overcoaching, where strategies are micromanaged to the point of paralysis. "Let the players play," he urges. "Fewer timeouts mean more reliance on in-game instincts, which is how the best basketball is played." This shift could reduce game lengths, making broadcasts more viewer-friendly and alleviating the fatigue that plagues student-athletes during grueling seasons. From his time at St. John's, he recounts marathon games that dragged on due to stoppages, sapping energy from both teams and spectators.

Player development is another cornerstone of the argument. With the rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals and the transfer portal, college basketball is increasingly seen as a stepping stone to the pros. Yet, the rules divergence creates a disconnect. FIBA's emphasis on physicality—allowing more contact without fouls—could toughen up college players, preparing them for the rigors of international and NBA play. The coach stresses that current NCAA rules, with their stricter foul calls, sometimes shelter athletes from real-world basketball demands. "We've got kids coming out of college who are shocked by the physicality overseas," he observes. By adopting FIBA's foul interpretations, colleges could produce more well-rounded players, enhancing their draft stock and global appeal. He cites examples from his St. John's squads, where players transitioned to Europe and struggled initially due to rule shock, underscoring the need for alignment.

Critics might argue that such changes would erode the unique identity of college basketball, but the former coach counters that evolution is essential for survival. He points to the women's game, which has already experimented with FIBA-like elements, such as the four-quarter format, and seen positive results in terms of pace and parity. "If it works for the women, why not the men?" he questions. Furthermore, this adoption could foster greater international recruitment, bringing diverse talent to U.S. campuses and enriching the sport culturally. Imagine more European stars choosing NCAA programs knowing the rules mirror what they're used to back home.

Of course, implementation wouldn't be without challenges. Conferences and the NCAA would need to collaborate on rule changes, potentially facing resistance from traditionalists. Logistical adjustments, like retraining officials and educating coaches, would be necessary. Yet, the potential upsides—faster games, better player prep, and increased fan engagement—make it a worthwhile pursuit. The ex-St. John's coach envisions pilot programs in non-conference games to test these rules, gathering data before a full rollout.

In wrapping up his insights, the former coach reflects on his passion for the game that defined his career. "College basketball has given me everything, but it's time to give back by making it better," he says. By looking to FIBA for inspiration, the sport could honor its roots while stepping boldly into the future. This isn't about abandoning tradition; it's about enhancing it. As debates rage on in boardrooms and locker rooms, one thing is clear: the call for FIBA rules in college basketball is more than a suggestion—it's a roadmap to revitalization.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full profootballnetwork.com Article at:
[ https://www.profootballnetwork.com/mens-cbb/former-st-john-coach-reveals-how-adopting-fiba-rules-could-improve-college-basketball/ ]