N※N

FTC Sues Apple Over News Market Dominance

  //food-wine.news-articles.net/content/2026/02/11/ftc-sues-apple-over-news-market-dominance.html
  Published in Food and Wine on Wednesday, February 11th 2026 at 21:18 GMT by TheWrap
      Locales: California, District of Columbia, UNITED STATES

Washington D.C. - February 12th, 2026 - The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) escalated its battle with Big Tech today, filing a landmark lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of illegally monopolizing the digital news market. The complaint, lodged in federal court in New Jersey, alleges Apple leveraged its dominance over iOS devices and the App Store ecosystem to systematically disadvantage competing news aggregators and subtly curate the information available to its hundreds of millions of users.

The FTC's case centers on Apple News+, the company's subscription-based news service launched in 2019. The agency argues that Apple didn't simply compete in the news market, but actively controlled it, using its App Store policies to stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. Specifically, the FTC claims Apple imposed onerous restrictions on third-party news applications, while simultaneously promoting Apple News+ through preferential treatment within the iOS environment.

According to the lawsuit, these restrictions included limitations on how competing apps could present content, hindering their ability to offer similar features or user experiences as Apple News+. The FTC further alleges that Apple employed algorithms and curation policies that suppressed conservative viewpoints, effectively creating an echo chamber for preferred narratives. While Apple denies these claims, the FTC believes these practices demonstrate a clear pattern of anti-competitive behavior.

"For years, Apple has employed anticompetitive tactics to stifle innovation and control the user experience on iOS," stated FTC Chairwoman Lina M. Khan in a press conference. "Apple's conduct harms consumers by limiting their access to diverse news sources and reducing competition in the market. This isn't just about news; it's about the fundamental right to access information freely and make informed decisions."

Apple swiftly responded, characterizing the lawsuit as "meritless" and a misrepresentation of its business practices. A company statement emphasized the benefits of Apple News+, including financial support for high-quality journalism and a curated reading experience. "We are confident that we can demonstrate that our practices are pro-competitive and benefit consumers, and we intend to vigorously defend against the FTC's claims," the statement read.

This lawsuit isn't occurring in a vacuum. Apple's App Store policies have been under intense scrutiny for years, attracting criticism from app developers and lawmakers who allege unfair commission rates and restrictive rules. Epic Games' ongoing legal battle with Apple, stemming from disputes over in-app purchase fees, set a precedent for challenging Apple's control over its digital marketplace. The current FTC case builds on that momentum, broadening the scope of the accusations to include the control of information itself.

Legal experts predict a protracted legal battle, with the outcome potentially reshaping the landscape of digital news distribution. "This case is about more than just one company and one app," explains Professor Amelia Harding, an antitrust law specialist at Georgetown University. "It's a test case for how we regulate the power of tech giants in the digital age. Can companies like Apple prioritize their own services while simultaneously operating a platform for others? This lawsuit will attempt to answer that question."

The FTC is seeking a court order to dismantle Apple's alleged monopolistic practices. The agency wants Apple to allow for greater competition in the news market by removing restrictions on third-party apps and ensuring equal access to iOS features. The suit also names Apple CEO Tim Cook and Chief Legal Officer Andrew Ferguson as responsible parties, suggesting the FTC believes their leadership played a direct role in the alleged anti-competitive behavior.

The implications of this case extend far beyond the financial implications for Apple and its competitors. It raises fundamental questions about the role of technology companies in shaping public discourse and the responsibility they have to ensure a diverse and unbiased flow of information. As consumers increasingly rely on digital platforms for news and information, the outcome of this lawsuit could have a profound impact on the future of journalism and the health of our democracy.